Delayed Initiation of Structured Rehabilitation After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Competitive Sprinter: A Case Report

Authors

  • Brijesh Vishwakarma, Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Physiotherapy, Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation's College of Physiotherapy, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra Author
  • Suvarna Ganvir Professor and HOD, Department of Neuro Physiotherapy, Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation's College of Physiotherapy, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra Author
  • Kabir Ghai Postgraduate Student, Department of Sports Physiotherapy, Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation's College of Physiotherapy, Ahilyanagar, Author

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) requires a balance between protection of the healing graft and progressive restoration of knee motion, quadriceps function, neuromuscular control, and sportspecific capacity. Delayed initiation of structured rehabilitation may complicate recovery when postoperative stiffness and muscle inhibition are already established. Case presentation: A 25-year-old male competitive 100-m sprinter sustained a full-thickness posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tear with a grade 2 anterior cruciate ligament sprain and grade 2 medial meniscal tear following a motor vehicle accident. Arthroscopic PCL reconstruction was performed. Structured physiotherapy was not initiated for approximately six weeks, by which time knee flexion was limited to about 45°. Manipulation under anaesthesia was subsequently performed, after which a 12-week structured rehabilitation programme was commenced. Intervention: Rehabilitation was progressed in three phases. Early management emphasized swelling and pain control, restoration of knee motion, quadriceps activation, gait retraining, and avoidance of isolated resisted hamstring loading. Intermediate rehabilitation introduced closed-kinetic-chain strengthening and progressive functional loading. The final phase incorporated advanced strengthening, dynamic balance, conditioning, and graded running-related activities. Outcomes : At rehabilitation baseline, active knee flexion was 60°, passive flexion 70°, and extension lag 15°. Quadriceps and hamstring strength were 3+/5 and 3-/5, respectively, and the patient was unable to complete dynamic functional tests. By week 12, active flexion had increased to 135°, passive flexion to 140°, and extension lag had resolved. Manual muscle testing was 5/5 for both quadriceps and hamstrings. Quadriceps tendon pain decreased from 7/10 to 1/10 and patellar tendon pain from 6/10 to 0/10. The 1-minute squat test improved from inability to perform the test to 48 repetitions. Stork balance time reached 110 seconds on the involved limb. Limb girth improved substantially, although small residual asymmetry remained. Modified Star Excursion Balance Test limb symmetry indices were 94% anteriorly, 75% posteromedially, and 82% posterolaterally at discharge. Conclusion: Marked gains in knee motion, strength, gait, pain, and functional performance were observed during 12 weeks of structured rehabilitation initiated after postoperative stiffness had developed. The case supports the feasibility of substantial functional recovery despite delayed rehabilitation, but it does not establish treatment efficacy or readiness for unrestricted competitive sprinting. Residual dynamic-balance asymmetry and the absence of longer-term return-to-sport data warrant continued rehabilitation and objective reassessment.

Keywords:

Athlete; Posterior cruciate ligament; PCL reconstruction; Rehabilitation; Return to sport; Sprinter
96 Views22 Downloads

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Delayed Initiation of Structured Rehabilitation After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Competitive Sprinter: A Case Report. (2026). Journal of Sports and Musculoskeletal Science, 1(1), 28-34. https://jsmsci.com/index.php/home/article/view/11